Time's up Tony Wood

It's a funny feeling when you're in a club and you realise your friends have disappeared. It was 1998 and I was nineteen. One of them had an anxiety condition, a benzo addiction and a habit of wigging out on ecstasy. It didn't take me long to join the dots.


I went outside to find a phone and dialled the only mobile we had. It was off. I found out later they were at the hospital and phones were not allowed.

This isn't a tragic story. No-one died. What I remember is standing beside the phone booth, telling someone else from the club what had happened. 'Anna Wood' he said, and laughed. It was meant to be reassuring - as in, 'that's never going to happen'. I wasn't reassured.

Anna Wood was a constant presence in my teens and early 20s. In 1995 she died of overhydration after consuming ecstasy at a rave in Sydney. I was in year 10. She grew up and went to school not far from me.

These were the last days of that era of the Sydney rave scene. On the bus to school one day a friend lent me his headphones to listen to a hard house mix by a DJ called Scooter. When the bell rang for class I was still listening, staring into space and thinking - holy shit, there is another world.

By the time I was 18, dance music and clubs were a big part of my life, and ecstasy was a part of that too. Throughout my early drug-taking years Anna Wood's story was a constant message: that taking illegal drugs was dangerous, rebellious and cool.

A person born in 1995 would be 20 this year - just entering the decade when ecstasy consumption in Australia peaks. About one in five Australians in their 20s have tried ecstasy, and are willing to admit to it in the government's triennial survey. (And despite the stereotypes of drug use and failure, wealthier kids who go to university are the ones most likely to use an illegal drug.)

For people my age, Anna's story was almost universally known and widely discussed, and was the subject of a book that her parents co-wrote. I've found that people in their 20s now usually don't know who Anna was. When her father Tony Wood told Anna's story during JJJ Hack's TV show on drugs last week, the younger people responded as if they were hearing the story for the first time.

Watching the show I was reminded again that it's a tragedy that Tony and Angela Wood's daughter died. For what they experienced I am, as a parent, sympathetic in a way that's difficult to express in words.

Tony_and_Angela_Wood.jpgWhen Tony tells Anna's story, it reminds us of what is at stake: the lives of people we love.

But Tony has used Anna's story to create his own very different but also tragic story. It's a story of good intentions, but not virtue. Since his daughter died, he's campaigned for zero-tolerance and for 'real' war on drugs. In his grief and in the tragedy of his story, he has become influential and untouchable. He has opposed harm minimisation, claiming it is some kind of conspiracy whose real purpose is to promote drug use. For Tony, the only message is abstinence.

The solutions that Tony proposes are no solutions at all. 'Just say no' has manifestly failed to prevent drug use because it doesn't make sense. Even more troubling is that Tony has promoted an approach that maximises the harm that young people experience from using drugs. He's helped build a world for my own kids and millions like them that's more dangerous than it needs to be. A world where more deaths like Anna's are more likely, not less.

Abstinence is a good message. If it's the only message, that's a problem. We live in a world where people use ecstasy. We can and should keep telling compelling stories to young people about why they should not use ecstasy. We also need to respond to the reality that people are using this drug.

There is too much at stake to allow people like Tony Woods to determine how we respond to the reality of illicit drug use. Against his emotion and instinct, we have science and science shows that harm reduction works. It's also the moral thing to do. People who we love use ecstasy, and we want them to live.

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Mary Fisk
    I have just read Tony Wood ‘s article in today’s Daily Telegraph about Monday night’s Q&A program in the ABC.
    You summed up Q&A perfectly Tony. I feel Q&A often follows the format of “the panel was biased with a less than fortunate balance”.
    Your wife came to Orange in 1988 under my request to talk to the High School students here in Orange about drugs. It had a huge impact on my own children and I’m sure several others. There is ABSOLUTELY no use in pill testing. NO drug is safe to take, tested or not. We won’t put a brussel sprout in our mouth if we don’t like it but we have kids putting pills in their mouths when they DON’T know what’s in them or where they were maufactured!!!!
    If you need a pill to get a high at a music concert then change your taste, you’re obviously not into that kind of music!!!! Music is GREAT drug in itself.
    Keep up your great work Tony and Angela. You are wonderful Australians.
    Love you,
    Mary Fisk xo
  • Dan Andrews
    To me the real tragedy of Anna Wood has always seemed that if drug use had not been criminal Anna would most likely still be with us.
    Her friends didn’t have the information about their drugs they needed to stay safe and did not seek medical assistance in a timely fashion because they feared the law.
    This tragedy has everything to do with why prohibition and the war on drugs creates the greatest dangers posed by recreational drug use.
    It has no real relevance to any objective danger of well informed MDMA use.
    Yet Anna’s story has been constantly rolled out by the vested interests of the drug war as a moralising parable for their selfish and misguided cause.
    I feel terrible for Tony and the Woods’ families loss, but their grief has been co-opted by police and governments to reinforce and exacerbate the dangers created by the drug war which cost Anna her life.

    Anna Wood’s story should be told truthfully:
    Anna Wood died unnecessarily because our society failed her (and the rest of us) by making drugs artificially dangerous through legal prohibition. Anna died because her friends did not have the knowledge to prevent over hydration and did not seek medical help quickly enough because they feared the police.

    The vested interests in the drug war should not be allowed to misuse Anna’s story, they’ve been misrepresenting it for far too long.
  • Derek Williams
    Now there’s a co-incidence I wasn’t aware of. In the UK we had our own Anna Wood, also in 1995 a young girl of the same sort of age also died from over hydration after taking ecstasy, she was called Leah Betts. Much the same scenario happened as a result, her father became a strong anti-drug campaigner (although, to be fair less zero tolerant than this guy) and the case of Leah was used to attack harm reduction and drug law reform very effectively.

    Most famously Leah’s image on her death bed in hospital was used in an anti ecstasy poster with the straplinbe “one pill took Leah Betts”, the poster campaign was paid for by the brewers association. It lead directly to the present government drug campaign, and the past 20 years of increasing prohibition.

    The story parallels are shocking, time to change indeed.